From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 12:08:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83sj1ky7sy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d2tu49lu.fsf@gnu.org> <8338u4o39r.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjwbkmt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqrfkjvo.fsf@gnu.org> <838v3qebns.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqr9csah.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqr297da.fsf@gnu.org> <83txm34g6k.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2srt645.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5bfkmsz.fsf@yandex.ru> <834ne3sziw.fsf@gnu.org> <519504DD.1030004@yandex.ru> <8338tmu9m0.fsf@gnu.org> <83hai2rlm0.fsf@gnu.org> <51961D09.7030502@yandex.ru> <83d2spsqa1.fsf@gnu.org> <519638A0.70807@[87.69.4.28]> <837gixsmwh.fsf@gnu.org> <51964CD3.1010106@yandex.ru> <8338tlsibr.fsf@gnu.org> <831u95sdwi.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjvtqwf0.fsf@gnu.org> <51969776.4060206@y> <83txm0rc1o.fsf@gnu.org> <5197371A.20401@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368868139 21943 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2013 09:08:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 18 11:08:57 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Udd8K-0002VM-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 May 2013 11:08:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Udd8J-0001Dl-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 May 2013 05:08:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Udd8D-0001DF-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2013 05:08:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Udd86-0007Eu-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2013 05:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Udd86-0007Ea-NQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2013 05:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MMZ00100LAP5500@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2013 12:08:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MMZ001NGLEA4Z10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 18 May 2013 12:08:41 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5197371A.20401@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159659 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 12:08:58 +0400 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Sorry, I don't follow. Are you saying that there's still a crash > > after applying the patch, except that you cannot get a backtrace when > > the crash happens? > > Yes. > > > What exactly happens when you try to produce a > > backtrace? > > I get the output I sent in the previous email. So the problem is that the backtrace stops early, is that right? Anyway, can you verify that the function unload_dlls is being called at exit, and that it does unload libgnutls-28.dll? Setting a breakpoint at the line that calls FreeLibrary should allow you to display the value of loaded_from variable, which is a list showing the library and the handle used to load it. > > Are you sure you switch to the correct thread when asking > > for a backtrace? > > Doesn't 'abort' breakpoint hit guarantee that I'm on the right thread? No, not on Windows anyway.