From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Przemysław Wojnowski" <esperanto@cumego.com>
Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
andreas.roehler@online.de, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk
Subject: Re: burden of maintainance
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 10:15:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83si5s4e4c.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560F78F2.4030400@cumego.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Andreas Röhler
> <andreas.roehler@online.de>, Emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> From: Przemysław Wojnowski <esperanto@cumego.com>
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 08:42:58 +0200
>
> > "make check" is part of the GNU Coding Standards. See:
> Maybe it should be changed to conform to the rest of the world, making
> it intuitive at the same time.
>
> IMHO the name should reveal its intent and "check" doesn't tell what is
> it checking (maybe whether environment is ready for compilation?).
>
> "make test" is understandable and intuitive, especially to anyone who
> has any experience building software in other environments.
If they both do the same, we have the best of all worlds, no? So why
continue arguing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-03 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-01 8:10 burden of maintainance Andreas Röhler
2015-10-01 16:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-01 18:46 ` Andreas Röhler
2015-10-01 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-01 20:18 ` Andreas Röhler
2015-10-01 20:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 13:54 ` Przemysław Wojnowski
2015-10-02 14:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 17:18 ` Tassilo Horn
2015-10-02 18:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 18:47 ` joakim
2015-10-02 19:16 ` Tassilo Horn
2015-10-02 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 19:28 ` Chad Brown
2015-10-02 7:51 ` Helmut Eller
2015-10-02 8:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 8:56 ` Helmut Eller
2015-10-02 8:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 11:46 ` Michael Albinus
2015-10-02 11:58 ` Phillip Lord
2015-10-02 13:14 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-10-02 13:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 15:00 ` Andreas Röhler
2015-10-02 15:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 17:19 ` Andreas Röhler
2015-10-02 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-02 18:54 ` Andreas Röhler
2015-10-02 20:39 ` Tassilo Horn
2015-10-03 6:53 ` Andreas Röhler
2015-10-03 7:31 ` Tassilo Horn
2015-10-03 1:38 ` Richard Stallman
2015-10-03 0:38 ` Eric Ludlam
2015-10-02 23:24 ` Xue Fuqiao
2015-10-03 6:42 ` Przemysław Wojnowski
2015-10-03 7:00 ` Xue Fuqiao
2015-10-03 7:15 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-10-01 16:34 ` Przemysław Wojnowski
2015-10-02 11:25 ` Phillip Lord
2015-10-02 12:27 ` Michael Albinus
2015-10-02 14:53 ` Phillip Lord
2015-10-02 16:56 ` Michael Albinus
2015-10-03 1:35 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83si5s4e4c.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=andreas.roehler@online.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=esperanto@cumego.com \
--cc=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk \
--cc=xfq.free@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).