From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Human-readable file sorting Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 16:43:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83si0no31f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87povs41xg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bn7c3yms.fsf@gnus.org> <83si0npxtn.fsf@gnu.org> <87si0nlirx.fsf@gnus.org> <8360xjpq91.fsf@gnu.org> <87oabbli5g.fsf@gnus.org> <87k2lzpijs.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455979458 3608 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2016 14:44:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alexis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 15:44:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aX8lT-0004Pl-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:44:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX8lS-0001Nh-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX8lN-0001G3-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX8lI-0005nf-PI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX8lI-0005nb-LV; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1803 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aX8lH-0000SO-2w; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:43:55 -0500 In-reply-to: <87k2lzpijs.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alexis on Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:23:19 +1100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200317 Archived-At: > From: Alexis > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:23:19 +1100 > > But, having read all the other posts in this discussion, i'm still > not clear whether `logical-string-lessp` would use > `string-collate-lessp` "under the hood" (or at least follow the > value of LC_COLLATE or its closest equivalent)? That's up to the person who will implement that, but IMO it's unlikely: these two use different comparison routines that are not easy to reconcile into one. > i ask due to things like this: > > https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard/issues/18#issuecomment-92006062 They don't understand how supporting multiple languages makes anything locale-specific go against the design.