From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bug #23794; sort-line behavior regressed from prior Emacs versions Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:26:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83shwa9zmr.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466270764 22190 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2016 17:26:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rswgnu@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 18 19:26:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEK0O-0007fZ-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:26:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35770 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEK0N-0001Aw-4a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:25:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEK0H-0001Am-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEK0D-0004gw-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEK0D-0004gJ-Eo; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1886 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bEK0B-0000dh-Jv; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:25:48 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Weiner on Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:01:54 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204477 Archived-At: > From: Robert Weiner > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:01:54 -0400 > > I would like this to be considered for marking as a blocking issue on the next release, so that the patch may be > applied and users do not experience sort-line problems.. A patch was provided which should be compatible > with any tests available for sort-lines. The patch makes Emacs behave as it did before Emacs outlines moved > to overlays for outlining and away from \r characters to denote hidden lines, that is sort-lines works on visible > lines not invisible ones. Please let me know your decision after discussion. Thanks, Bob Sorry, but I disagree. A new feature can never block a release.