From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:57:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83shvonndp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9cdmj6t.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87eg7f13re.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <058583919239409e2607da119d0a5f29.squirrel@cloud103.planethippo.com> <20160705091101.37648890@thinkpax> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467730772 27046 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2016 14:59:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Etienne Prud'homme Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 16:59:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bKRol-0005Tv-54 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:59:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKRok-0004Ii-BY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKRnk-0004Ga-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKRnh-0001vj-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKRnh-0001vc-1E; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3207 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bKRnc-0002MN-M4; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:58:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160705091101.37648890@thinkpax> (message from Etienne Prud'homme on Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:11:01 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205180 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:11:01 -0400 > From: Etienne Prud'homme > > Could CEDET be refactored in ways that we could enjoy many of its > functions? Maybe, but that should be done on a case-by-case basis. With CEDET, this is already been done, and continues being done. (I wish we could do that more and more quickly, but at least we are under way.)