From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: refcards out of date? Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:42:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83shramtst.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161031153709.41c94de7@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <837f8nnl95.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478058215 26909 195.159.176.226 (2 Nov 2016 03:43:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 03:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: perry@piermont.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 04:43:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1mS6-0002xa-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 04:43:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52390 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1mS8-0002F7-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1mRV-0002Er-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1mRU-0002to-RE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1mRP-0002rl-07; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4591 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c1mRF-0003Yc-Uq; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:42:10 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:21:32 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209099 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, perry@piermont.com > Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:21:32 -0400 > > > > > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/refcards/pdf/refcard.pdf > > > > etc. are still the Emacs 24 versions. > > > > > > Does the procedure for preparing a release include > > > a step to update these? > > > Yes. The release tarball includes them. > > Can anyone see how come they were not updated this time? They are, in the tarball. E.g., refcard.pdf there says "version 25". I think the problem is that no one replaced the refcards on the GNU Web site.