From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: jim@meyering.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: building/using address-sanitizer-enabled emacs?
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 17:39:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83shkfct06.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d74b8c73-f055-0261-23a3-37f0ed9aac1c@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 7 May 2017 22:42:22 -0700)
> Cc: jim@meyering.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 22:42:22 -0700
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I'm not aware of any problems with its current state
>
> Startup performance is the main problem that we were worried about for that
> approach, and Ken's most recent message on the topic said that startup
> performance remains a significant issue.
That's not a problem (as in "bug", which were fixed by Ken, at least
those that we know about). This "problem" is a limitation of the
method, and I'm not sure the method implemented on the branch can be
significantly sped up, unless we completely rethink what Lisp we load
at startup and how.
This limitation is exactly the reason why we will soon have to decide
whether we merge the branch and start using it, improving what can be
improved and living with that which cannot, or keep using unexec at
least till Emacs 27.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-07 3:40 building/using address-sanitizer-enabled emacs? Jim Meyering
2017-05-07 19:54 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-07 21:44 ` Jim Meyering
2017-05-08 2:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-08 5:42 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-08 14:39 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-05-08 14:46 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-08 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-09 5:48 ` Jim Meyering
2017-05-09 15:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-09 17:06 ` Jim Meyering
2017-05-09 17:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-09 19:22 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-09 22:49 ` Jim Meyering
2017-05-10 2:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-16 21:49 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-17 2:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 14:46 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-17 16:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 20:05 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-18 4:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-09 23:15 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-05-10 2:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-10 22:24 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-05-13 8:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-13 15:08 ` [PATCH] Fix use of sockaddr_in Philipp Stephani
2017-05-13 16:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-13 19:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-05-13 19:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-13 20:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-05-14 2:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-14 6:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-05-14 14:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-15 6:15 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-15 9:04 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-05-17 20:38 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-27 11:35 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-05-17 15:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 20:15 ` Paul Eggert
2017-05-14 10:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2017-05-14 19:06 ` Philipp Stephani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83shkfct06.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jim@meyering.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).