From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:33:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83shi2j2t9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8yjcem0.fsf@gmail.com> <8337a3j8te.fsf@gnu.org> <87shi3j8kt.fsf@gmail.com> <83zicbhs8c.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9srj6kc.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499794983 7942 195.159.176.226 (11 Jul 2017 17:43:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:43:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 19:42:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzBX-0001Zn-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:42:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzBc-0002K5-Oy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:43:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUz2y-0002m4-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUz2t-0003t2-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUz2t-0003sl-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2058 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dUz2s-0004co-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:33:59 -0400 In-reply-to: <87o9srj6kc.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:12:51 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216494 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:12:51 +0200 > > > Btw, if I were to do this, what other face attributes would you expect > > to see removed from the empty fields, in addition to background color? > > Or do you simply want them to be displayed using the line-number face > > instead? (That could be a different font size.) > > I'd expect it to use the line-number face. I confidently predict > opinions will differ here :-) Well, using line-number is definitely easier to implement than what I originally thought you wanted. But let's see those opinions first ;-) > BTW, since we're discussing options, I definitely don't want a > configuration variable, let's just decide one way or the other. Agreed.