From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Off Topic Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:20:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83sh6haxm9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7D0B397D-5D1B-4B8C-93B6-1CA207DD552A@scratch.space> <6271469D-6B02-4334-828E-D81816143734@scratch.space> <87d0xltogq.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527175296 30728 195.159.176.226 (24 May 2018 15:21:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 17:21:32 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLs3W-0007ra-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:21:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39172 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLs5d-0005qi-KW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 11:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLs2h-0003iQ-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 11:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLs2d-00065v-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 11:20:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLs2d-00065d-4K; Thu, 24 May 2018 11:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3867 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fLs2c-0002iT-M9; Thu, 24 May 2018 11:20:35 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d0xltogq.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 24 May 2018 11:03:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225655 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: Noam Postavsky , van@scratch.space, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:03:33 +0200 > > Documenting rx.el would be a more productive use of time, I think, > especially since Iʼve now noticed via reading rx.el that we already > have sregex as well. Let's pick one rather than inventing a third > syntax. I'm all for more documentation, but in this case what would you add to the doc string that already is very long and very detailed?