From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 20:12:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83sh3qp0bq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <86in5jdj49.fsf@gmail.com> <83wotxaiwi.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1pxmvmx.fsf@gmail.com> <87efg4a9xc.fsf@tromey.com> <87a7qr8cz7.fsf@tromey.com> <86tvoy3je9.fsf@gmail.com> <86bmb0vbxf.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1pnfcg1.fsf@tromey.com> <86sh4b1833.fsf@gmail.com> <861sbgz3dm.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7q4ufxp.fsf@gnu.org> <87wot71hpb.fsf@tromey.com> <86in4rgt1m.fsf@gmail.com> <83pnyyu0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1p59haq.fsf@gmail.com> <83va8osuz2.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftzrknyg.fsf@tromey.com> <87bmaeltcz.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533661904 10567 195.159.176.226 (7 Aug 2018 17:11:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tom@tromey.com, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 07 19:11:40 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5WF-0002dr-U3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 19:11:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5YM-00065T-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 13:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5XY-0005cP-60 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 13:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5XX-00044o-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 13:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5XX-00044a-72; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 13:12:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2319 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5XW-0000NU-Kw; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 13:12:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:53:19 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228297 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:53:19 -0700 > Cc: Andy Moreton , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Tom Tromey wrote: > > So, XFIXNUM > > and XFASTFIXNUM? > > I'd get rid of XFASTINT. Its main reason for existing was faster extraction with > MSB tagging, but we don't do MSB any more (except for --with-wide-int, where the > faster extraction is not that much faster anyway). I see no reason yet to get rid of XFASTINT. Certainly not because we need to come up with one more macro name.