From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: master 64e25cd: More robust NS hex colour string parsing
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:35:29 +0300
Message-ID: <83sgey3m3i.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200608120746.30163.87810@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20200608120747.80E8E20A2E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <CAOqdjBfwzA205fJ75RhFivfNWteCPbwBM4Op+1+pewGZ2e8TiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <B40CDE57-D2A7-428C-9F9B-AB15B37DB1B4@acm.org> <83r1uk429y.fsf@gnu.org>
 <3C92A091-F389-4179-B2F0-B3AA5ABD6CCE@acm.org> <83pna43xrl.fsf@gnu.org>
 <9259B4A6-F3CC-4243-9F08-2882993C9B2C@acm.org> <83a71741mr.fsf@gnu.org>
 <E85270FD-9AD6-4EA3-AD7D-D9FB861D190E@acm.org> <83y2or2c0o.fsf@gnu.org>
 <82DE05DD-0F2A-4722-AB75-D9D95F58BAF4@acm.org> <83v9ju3nbl.fsf@gnu.org>
 <C6A4DB22-0A7A-42B3-A3D9-93EBCC8BE33E@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="43848"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= <mattiase@acm.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 13 19:36:26 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jkA4u-000BGu-H9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 19:36:24 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60470 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jkA4t-0003Of-Jb
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:36:23 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35048)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jkA4A-0002WA-OM
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:35:38 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60751)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jkA4A-0002Hc-Dn; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:35:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1424 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jkA49-00020L-Ed; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:35:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <C6A4DB22-0A7A-42B3-A3D9-93EBCC8BE33E@acm.org> (message from
 Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= on Sat, 13 Jun 2020 19:29:33 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252193
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/252193>

> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 19:29:33 +0200
> Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > How about (tty-color-values "#12345")? does it contradict yours?
> 
> No, it is an error that is (correctly) rejected by the new code in the same way that #xyz is currently rejected.

But it isn't rejected by the current code.  Which was my point all
along.

> > Then color-values-from-color-spec, I guess.
> 
> Thank you, but a smidgen too many 'color' in there.

I don't think so, no.