From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5ac7b48: Lift define-prefix-command to Lisp Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 20:33:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg7bi8ir.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210108141622.18118.12423@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210108141623.B325320BD3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83wnwnigux.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38006"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 08 19:34:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxwaP-0009mP-VV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 19:34:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxwaP-0002Db-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxwZJ-0001eH-De for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxwZI-0002gh-KD; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:33:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1040 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kxwZG-0002XI-Nb; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:32:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:51:38 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262769 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:51:38 -0600 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This question is pertinent when someone suggests a new function or > > feature. When talking about obsoleting an existing one, the right > > question is "does it do any harm, or do a bad job, or present some > > significant maintenance burden?" > > In this case, it seems that this "feature" is indeed doing a bad job. Which job does it do badly, and why?