From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Fix" sag scaling for hidpi Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 13:15:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <7308DB2C-27A5-4227-A1F9-9949EE558052@gmail.com> <87sg6alweo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17903"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, casouri@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 12:16:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8LZv-0004Y0-P7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:16:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59154 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8LZt-0002PO-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:16:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8LYs-0001w3-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8LYq-0007JO-Vg; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3075 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l8LYV-0002fL-MG; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:15:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:00:51 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264054 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:00:51 +0100 > Cc: Yuan Fu , Stefan Monnier , > emacs-devel > > > Thatʼs the wrong direction: pgtk is moving us towards logical pixel > > sizes (gtk already uses them, but there are some rough edges). > > Is there any realistic path we can take to change this in the > Windows/non-gtk cases, though? We should have the same on all > architectures, and if we can't transition the old ones to logical pixel > sizes, then the new ones will have to use physical ones, too. If someone explains what are the "logical" and "physical" pixel sizes, I could try figuring out what that means for the MS-Windows case.