From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:46:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg4sbs6w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sg6690vc.fsf@miha-pc> <87pn02ojwu.fsf@miha-pc> <875z1tfn0p.fsf@miha-pc> <83czvxd079.fsf@gnu.org> <83blbhcz41.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36719"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie , martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 18 12:47:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMr7c-0009OS-LN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:47:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36028 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMr7b-0001oT-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMr6Z-0001FI-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMr6Y-0002jP-C7; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4671 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lMr6W-0004cE-F5; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:46:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Mackenzie on Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:27:18 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266559 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:27:18 +0000 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > The problem that Miha highlighted is that when there is an open > minibuffer when that last frame is deleted, that open minibuffer remains > in existence, fouling up the next emacsclient session. > > Maybe such open minibuffers should just be aborted (along with any other > recursive edits) when the last frame gets deleted. This would be > simpler to code than preserving those minibuffers somewhere, and > restoring them at the next emacsclient session. Aborting them also > seems more natural, since their contents are unlikely to have any > relevance to the next emacsclient session. Martin, can you comment on this, please? > Incidentally, there doesn't seem to be anything in the Elisp manual > about the handling of Emacs daemon sessions. Please be more specific: which aspects of the daemon sessions would you like to be described that aren't already described?