From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:04:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg4m8i68.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <87tup3hwat.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <834kh39fvj.fsf@gnu.org> <87tup3gfwy.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2ef7zwm.fsf@gnu.org> <83tup37y51.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1k7eyow.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtuveygr.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="317"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yandros@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 23 08:04:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOb63-000ALX-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:04:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOb62-0003Ce-AB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOb5W-0002mm-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:04:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOb5V-0000cP-AI; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:04:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1359 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lOb5U-0004kk-MJ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:04:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mtuveygr.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:16:04 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266856 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com, yandros@gmail.com, > gregory@heytings.org, Stefan Monnier , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:16:04 +0100 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > >> ??? Including lisp-interaction-mode? > > > > Heh. > > > > (1 2 |3 4) > > > > and C-j in *scratch* gives me > > Oops, never mind -- C-j in that mode is `eval-print-last-sexp', which is > a totally different thing. Exactly my point. Thus, "C-o C-n" is much more reliable.