From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:12:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfzuo1b0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8735rzyzbz.fsf@163.com> <86v94v3xh9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87wnpargnb.fsf@elite.giraud> <87h7gey7zx.fsf@163.com> <83pmv2twrl.fsf@gnu.org> <86sfzwogsn.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83wnp8qqur.fsf@gnu.org> <867dh6n0l5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83czqypr6x.fsf@gnu.org> <86lf5ml8x9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4004"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: r12451428287@163.com, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 19:13:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sXj-0000q3-P2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:12:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sXi-0007J8-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:12:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sX7-0006eY-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sX3-0007Ax-Na; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1563 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sX2-0002dV-S1; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:12:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86lf5ml8x9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (message from Stephen Leake on Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:55:46 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271903 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Leake > Cc: r12451428287@163.com, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:55:46 -0700 > > >> I don't know what you mean by "the TS library". > > > > I mean libtree-sitter.a produced by building the library. > > > >> I'm guessing you mean the tree-sitter runtime, in which case no, that > >> does not include any languages. > > > > "Include" in what sense? > > There is no code in libtree-sitter.a that provides a language; all > languages are built separately, by the language developers. > > https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter builds libtree-sitter.a, and > the command line tools to build a language. > > https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-python builds the object file > providing the python language. > > There are many other languages, each with its own repository. We are talking past each other. But I don't think we should keep arguing about this, because there's no real disagreement here to argue about.