From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Shorthand variable named "elisp-shorthands" seems wrong Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:43:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfxqkx3p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tui6twco.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87tui6twco.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mtnytg6t.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wnn2kzmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tui6kzcv.fsf@gnu.org> <87czoutedq.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32328"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 14:44:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUpzr-0008Ab-VX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:44:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUpzq-0000yq-OA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUpye-0007pG-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:43:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUpyc-0004Kz-Al; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2164 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUpyb-0005hr-95; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:43:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87czoutedq.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 20:02:57 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275579 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 20:02:57 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Which it is, don't you agree? > > I think I should rephrase what I said earlier. I don't agree that it > applies to what currently uses the `elisp' prefix, which is currently > used by the likes of `elisp-byte-code-mode', and the `elisp-xref--' > group of variables. > > > Or how about elisp-symbol-shorthands? > > That still has the `elisp' prefix But this feature is specific to Elisp, isn't it?