From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:04:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfwlrv85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <87ilxi7531.fsf@gnus.org> <875yth7bjr.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1562"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 28 18:35:49 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mg8NY-0000Cm-EW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:35:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58520 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg8NW-0000Rz-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg7tj-0004dj-Vs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg7ti-0005YE-0E; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:04:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=mYxBWKW5bGyuCexlKLVSVJWVDvFHg6QsQZC5VWaYlqQ=; b=UDlj7n3+OdKf h+GCVO4LSqaCm+VUjHQNM0gtcmFLyx4MwefTueZGXM2ujVsPh2GJGmESWyvVzej4AzU/weOl87Q5V L7fB3uHyCOpIk6jQZPK/nHsYL19dm+RWPh7FK3axTPadM4RFKuAbi37IHh4V8lfqDnaV2rQaEqtf4 Ss3B9j6OX597q2zSP2iLom9Vc++L8rcRGDV+Hbl8z8+D/37DmBnodKMTXgGKspakqQL5/zKlzK068 g4wHZZEb3Mh1eXgQYcmAocclw5szw0nE9KwDRPeLi0iGevbG5f2fHjXP2H28miU/Si98yMiYmWP8o kNG66k3OfjOBVyb9IiexXg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3413 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg7tg-0001pF-PL; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:04:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: (raman@google.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278125 Archived-At: > From: "T.V Raman" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 07:19:55 -0700 > > Perhaps we already get what I am about to say below from what you have, > but given that there are 256 variation selectors, it might be useful to > have a bigram/trigram model for chars that can meaningfully compose as > an emoji? AFAIK, only 4 variation selectors actually have any effect in the available fonts (plus VS-15 and VS-16, which just select text or Emoji appearance).