From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution! Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfvcqkc1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335nh29pt.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnktzxb2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilwcyc6o.fsf@gnu.org> <8335nfw2pe.fsf@gnu.org> <838rx4s224.fsf@gnu.org> <834k7ss172.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 18:59:04 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msTsl-0006mb-U0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:59:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTsk-0004Ps-Ok for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTrZ-0002zW-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=33556 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTrZ-0003bJ-9w; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:57:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=rJRBp6KhW1bZjVHDLjwwJ4jeDXDPrcCsZg9+mMUATQ8=; b=pprkdRnwuRuC GFzLD35kGIrJdtn0VeCYF8D31Melv7UkeU1lZqduQ4ZTs2tiqnWB+jvyCezOUiI+i7wq+3NPt2g6d up0LMfQ2rcwxhkxCXjvsUNdAR8565xlAv8+LfYg7mCVzI7ZuzQqRymv5WzZcNK3zyXVKqlNlmig86 twH6EI7jgWMBn+rHGJ1cIsLz401yCrCGZQ1R5x3LA8tZlbp8dYTXrpIpmvqhE5Cvtd+u5ynpLjCFS jEvKRq7YWi1Rz84uKVCE2v5gT2cEj5+c3C60mfrLRuZp21pxDRBtxKDDvw+ago5Yn7CdJRgTEALPV knM4ffZsGMX/PhOaHuAcLQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4200 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTrZ-0004Oy-1N; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:57:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:53:03 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280666 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:53:03 +0000 > > Another quick note, I think we should evaluate the impact not only with > different benchmarks but also using a native compiled build (ATM the > branch has no support for that). Alan said he is going to do that.