From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making `x-underline-at-descent-line' a face attribute Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfu18dao.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lezt5v7h.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87lezt5v7h.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27488"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 06 09:44:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ONT-00071n-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 09:44:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51510 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ONS-0008P9-Bk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 03:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5OMd-0007iT-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 03:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=37730 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5OMd-0002xO-04; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 03:43:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=mTvvMlOsIeD50mfSsdzp0tjkv0c2/pdjTMyk9gdsbSU=; b=jZc8Ahm8pesd T/KEp0or858R5bLMvO+rpkTFt5hGklByTs/Pj/5vCeY65/QJ9awTc1t5EeKk2fFqn6Ixjhi93YKqf icI+EyQugFm2RCBTUDf2nXM/D6moAqW4xlRZ4A+hmGEvj5IXfNE4sWkRexVEZH25SmAbJZIKtEHHK n8DRwb4DUeKzsOGO1FUlUEGYOuzUNdHP0c5AVxRqMOu17r4rFxiO2EsXan+FuBMmDw+8nUaHTfFXC My2YAEN2JHzzR7p4j+9LrwR3gFcxy4Iv+dVM0czBXuO66z9CVsYhVqH07a5c5Z77ddGjz2EzQM/t4 a3aNhJvudaYd5/Y+xMZd6Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1495 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5OMc-0000zp-Ve; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 03:43:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Jim Porter on Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:08:57 -0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284295 Archived-At: > From: Jim Porter > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:08:57 -0800 > > What about enhancing the :box attribute further to allow different > widths (and possibly colors) for each of the 4 sides? The width part is already supported. We could make the value of :color be a cons cell as well, if that is useful (is it?) But mixing :box and :underline is IMO not a good idea. They are separate attributes.