Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change.

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:44:01 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> >> Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:24:26 +0000
> >> 
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> >> but on my system, it immediately suggests upgrading 24 packages, which
> >> >> is a lot.
> >> >
> >> > Can you show the list of those 24 packages?
> >> 
> >> I am on a different system now, so the prompt differs slightly and have
> >> other updates, but this is what it looks like:
> >> 
> >> Packages to install: 23 (xref-1.6.3
> >> verilog-mode-2022.12.18.181110314 use-package-2.4.5 tramp-2.6.0.4
> >> svg-1.1 soap-client-3.2.1 so-long-1.1.2 python-0.28 project-0.9.8
> >> org-9.6.5 ntlm-2.1.0 nadvice-0.4 map-3.3.1 let-alist-1.0.6
> >> jsonrpc-1.0.17 flymake-1.3.4 external-completion-0.1 erc-5.5
> >> eldoc-1.14.0 eglot-1.15 cl-lib-0.7.1 cl-generic-0.3 bind-key-2.4.1).
> >> Packages to upgrade: 2 (editorconfig-0.9.1 inspector-0.29).
> >> Proceed? (y or n)
> >
> > I see nothing unexpected in this list.  And since the feature is
> > opt-in, what are the dangers of having it?
> 
> There is no danger, it might just be overwhelming?  I was a bit
> surprised at first.  But if you think it is fine, then I have no
> objections.

One more question: the patch you proposed affects both "U" and "/ u",
right?