From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: contributing to Emacs Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 13:02:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfapnl57.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8fnh1h2.fsf@web.de> <83mt0zs9rc.fsf@gnu.org> <0a968a4e1b267c0f15dd237e6ea12a709fc06d5e.camel@yandex.ru> <838rcisj7o.fsf@gnu.org> <6537fa5fa5c1fe8437ed99ee0988e35895f5a54b.camel@yandex.ru> <8423a35750d8d8e0437c7708f6b4d0bbdfdb7fe0.camel@yandex.ru> <87o7ldf7ky.fsf@web.de> <8cc19084ab18d0adb0f2cee4af14aa1b1d914a83.camel@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14009"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arne_bab@web.de, ams@gnu.org, luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 18 12:02:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qApF7-0003Vw-DW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 12:02:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qApEt-0000ZV-Op; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 06:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qApEr-0000ZJ-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 06:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qApEr-00012b-HX; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 06:02:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=0hfSR6ct30wWaC0SMte3eSnMje7R0N5Dn0sgvJnM+IU=; b=nEOwEDaHy83S NOGdeEYzh+smK4ZQjzvNLIPTG7gSa+mqnKySr9Ko1km1w9Kv0pYUhP1snSUlh0TsAa4NvS7H+FnDP uzCrgmUrGvHfo+x4vb1yuhLTzYiWym6zoZ8MVRCJ3jf+ZIB9J7W2jKMRRqZkHSen9WAObz0Txy0fU NDvYr1zv7G+wG/bV4rYSZKuAAQpIyek+h8X71oms2OyF57AczuTriSCmNN/CpJFeYNUSwW7N+L6OX h2TOjfBOSXDOjuPo+8RnkykvQ/mZn7yoHvDqe3LhdqVftDA3hj3ZK9hKX/brx5dhdon/chY/r2sQW PflIT3wDANceKVqKT7NSuA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qApEq-00050L-Au; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 06:02:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Konstantin Kharlamov on Sun, 18 Jun 2023 12:56:33 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306942 Archived-At: > From: Konstantin Kharlamov > Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , eliz@gnu.org, luangruo@yahoo.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 12:56:33 +0300 > > Okay, so, here's an obvious one: a patch series sent to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > should not create separate bugreports for every patch. > > In ML-managed projects it is typical to send patches as a series, and when you > doing that results in such surprising behaviour, it creates an additional > emotional and mental load both for you and for maintainers who would need to do > something with these separate reports. Our preference is to send patches as a single patch, not as patch series. That said, people are sometimes sending series, and we don't ask them to resend, we process those series anyway. As for separate bug reports, this is easily fixed by merging them. So I see no problem here.