From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 15:23:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83sf8wpdfu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1428589171.162865.1691134964773@mail1.libero.it> <87v8ds5xr4.fsf@yahoo.com> <838raoqzro.fsf@gnu.org> <5235398.eMNxiy0SpO@nimes> <87edkg5ptd.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18033"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bruno@clisp.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 06 14:23:40 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qScnM-0004Ul-4y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 14:23:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qScmr-0006Zj-Dr; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qScmm-0006Z8-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qScmk-00033A-4o; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:23:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Ej8+es3mg0sLNWE8yZjG0dHPQuSnycDBIKL/gu/IdGk=; b=Snel8+tzivD+ JU0iBUN2VjmyP2+3mBUiLU4XReeyPZNbK+1qNGdgDOAQ/o6v2mQkPwdy7y/oZ703hyh58NLIfQLh0 Ewhyem8VmrKQq4pwQ6OEczfvOs2ns1yriU7/sAuEnPK3J7gyZ/N7553WuZLX179Dc7W8Zh31X2kYY AhX8r9NsDB0eLX+sGuR1Go3L7yYpxqmGDf5TG0eL3kuFMlUqG3kqaoaMxsRsprDc2eW7pXYodi3rg 6s02n3wkOMynAd0JjSV0uvA9bKUdJ6xB0anfNaoOx0vfynLdBZHfqYfTIW2IyodKnO7v1CpCrVuCC clduQhjwhcuonm4rvvC+wA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qScmj-0002Q4-Kr; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:23:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87edkg5ptd.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sun, 06 Aug 2023 20:16:14 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308354 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, angelo.g0@libero.it, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 20:16:14 +0800 > > Bruno Haible writes: > > > Rationale: I cannot guarantee that Gnulib will be able to support %n > > in the long run. The "security-aware community" are filing CVEs here and > > there; %n is among their targets (it has already been disabled from libc > > on Ubuntu, macOS, and MSVC); and I don't know when they will discover > > that Gnulib still enables it. > > Then Gnulib should disregard their whims and move on. I think what Bruno tells us is that removing %n where it is not strictly needed is a good way of eliminating the cause for both problems. We may not agree with CVEs against %n, but we won't keep %n just because we disagree, right?