From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Help testing emacs-28.3-rc1.tar.gz on MS-Windows
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 21:14:32 +0300
Message-ID: <83sf8eyk53.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CADwFkm=N5=zWnQkP+jMZ3jG7OgzyJU6B84rNvajopS5jaD6HDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87mt59lq8s.fsf@moondust.localdomain>
 <CADwFkmnwgozmwEWvD4WtQMYT6Lf8iOc3yTNEchXNLqerZnVKhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <83r0ulwvhz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmku4g_paBjGbBdexjMEay8YKWj=cP3D9X2Fwmj7BvZvpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CCE46F99-8AB5-4479-9D42-32FEC15E018A@gmail.com>
 <E1pYfcL-00078b-Ig@fencepost.gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="31916"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: casouri@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, njackson@posteo.net,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 19 20:15:11 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1qXQTe-00083h-12
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 20:15:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1qXQSx-0004RW-E6; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:14:27 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1qXQSw-0004RK-32
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:14:26 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1qXQSv-0003cc-QH; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:14:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=6aHGdKnXwwojzdxWDdkSH7lRer3LdBsAzizkAEgyO4A=; b=gDu/7zrTGvQ3
 97VRPxDw209wcMw95W812rf2uWFBIZkuO7znpZ94LXn67CXSuFo7C6xffe+gXIs17phTl4JwgkitC
 fhf5sm8DDYrrStTGGJfDoaFTCLUXjMCfhCuqwrESI42yTSpEYdWrV9Vh5qhlZ3foUDWpJd1goO2GU
 xI1Qih9P8JKy0HdCl5t0FNeWL1VWSrO6+6RslP11P4EPWnBLrLw9/cHmVUe++c76aCnP1WgRWzW4K
 S1wKWIBuMGeDxaoE+clrZUBsPsN6YDjL02WUtLv91EOOlZOf2Rz2HSCK2dGZ/UDXKql99zgYpbHQc
 h0M1begN4zZXxAgudkbDpg==;
In-Reply-To: <E1pYfcL-00078b-Ig@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
 Stallman on Sat, 04 Mar 2023 23:05:01 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308940
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/308940>

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, njackson@posteo.net,
> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2023 23:05:01 -0500
> 
>   > I have excellent news for you: https://hynek.me/til/copyright-years/
> 
> If he is right, that would be a convenience.  But we are following the
> advice our lawyers gave.  Hynek is not our lawyer, and I don't know
> a reason to have confidence in him.
> 
> I would be remiss to take whichwever advice is most convenient for us
> just because it is convienient.
> 
> But I will ask a lawyer who advises the FSF about this question.

Any news about this?