From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Help testing emacs-28.3-rc1.tar.gz on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 21:14:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83sf8eyk53.fsf@gnu.org> References: <CADwFkm=N5=zWnQkP+jMZ3jG7OgzyJU6B84rNvajopS5jaD6HDw@mail.gmail.com> <87mt59lq8s.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <CADwFkmnwgozmwEWvD4WtQMYT6Lf8iOc3yTNEchXNLqerZnVKhQ@mail.gmail.com> <83r0ulwvhz.fsf@gnu.org> <CADwFkmku4g_paBjGbBdexjMEay8YKWj=cP3D9X2Fwmj7BvZvpg@mail.gmail.com> <CCE46F99-8AB5-4479-9D42-32FEC15E018A@gmail.com> <E1pYfcL-00078b-Ig@fencepost.gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31916"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, njackson@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 19 20:15:11 2023 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1qXQTe-00083h-12 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 20:15:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1qXQSx-0004RW-E6; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:14:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1qXQSw-0004RK-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:14:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1qXQSv-0003cc-QH; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:14:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=6aHGdKnXwwojzdxWDdkSH7lRer3LdBsAzizkAEgyO4A=; b=gDu/7zrTGvQ3 97VRPxDw209wcMw95W812rf2uWFBIZkuO7znpZ94LXn67CXSuFo7C6xffe+gXIs17phTl4JwgkitC fhf5sm8DDYrrStTGGJfDoaFTCLUXjMCfhCuqwrESI42yTSpEYdWrV9Vh5qhlZ3foUDWpJd1goO2GU xI1Qih9P8JKy0HdCl5t0FNeWL1VWSrO6+6RslP11P4EPWnBLrLw9/cHmVUe++c76aCnP1WgRWzW4K S1wKWIBuMGeDxaoE+clrZUBsPsN6YDjL02WUtLv91EOOlZOf2Rz2HSCK2dGZ/UDXKql99zgYpbHQc h0M1begN4zZXxAgudkbDpg==; In-Reply-To: <E1pYfcL-00078b-Ig@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 04 Mar 2023 23:05:01 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308940 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/308940> > From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, njackson@posteo.net, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2023 23:05:01 -0500 > > > I have excellent news for you: https://hynek.me/til/copyright-years/ > > If he is right, that would be a convenience. But we are following the > advice our lawyers gave. Hynek is not our lawyer, and I don't know > a reason to have confidence in him. > > I would be remiss to take whichwever advice is most convenient for us > just because it is convienient. > > But I will ask a lawyer who advises the FSF about this question. Any news about this?