From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Low redisplay performance (23 regression) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:15:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83r5zmhf2q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4870CC42-A08E-4BE9-B566-0F4DA7AB0B74@gmail.com> <873ac3arbf.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240283771 23350 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2009 03:16:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 21 05:17:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lw6UC-00061A-A9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:17:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50721 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw6Sn-0005oU-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw6Si-0005oE-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw6Sg-0005o2-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56078 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw6Sg-0005nz-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il ([84.95.2.19]:30901) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lw6Sg-0004ym-6e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KIF00700KPRSN00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:15:52 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.219.161]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KIF00MY0L2F9M20@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:15:52 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <873ac3arbf.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110383 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:33:24 -0400 > Cc: Emacs-Devel devel > > David Reitter writes: > > > I'm wondering if others get the same on other platforms comparing 22 > > and 23, or if this is a problem specifically in the NS port (for > > example, with setting drawing color or the like). > > On GNU/Linux, I do not experience much of a difference in performance > between Emacs 22 and Emacs 23. And I see no difference on Windows.