From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows-specific questions about Bazaar Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83r5reko08.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834ooamrou.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdgql9zg.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259727622 17924 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2009 04:20:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 04:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alexander Belchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 05:20:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFghG-0007ZT-M4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:20:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFghG-0007OH-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFghB-0007Nu-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:20:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFgh5-0007NH-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54962 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFgh5-0007NE-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:56614) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFgh5-0004M8-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KU000100BKSCC00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:19:58 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.213.252]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KU0000XLC18U730@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:19:57 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118110 Archived-At: > From: Alexander Belchenko > Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:15:49 +0200 > > > Sure, it works; I didn't want to imply it doesn't I think the default > > SSH client (paramiko, whatever that is) uses pageant for > > authentication, but plink is not used unless BZR_SSH is set. > > I'm not quite understand your last remark. There was a period missing there, after "doesn't". Does that help to understand it? I was just telling Lennart how I think it works by default: uses pageant for authentication, but does not use plink or psftp for the actual access. > Using paramiko on Windows is safe choice. I was asking about relative merits. Are there any?