From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bidi,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Re: Arabic support Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:33:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83r5gmw7uy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1859140447.883981283872081603.JavaMail.root@zimbra3-e1.priv.proxad.net> <83eicy5epd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285140806 1418 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2010 07:33:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-bidi@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-bidi-bounces+gnu-emacs-bidi=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 09:33:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gnu-emacs-bidi@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJpO-0004c3-ED for gnu-emacs-bidi@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:33:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyJpN-0007oA-Mc for gnu-emacs-bidi@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52384 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyJpK-0007nS-50 for emacs-bidi@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:33:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJpF-0001V7-JZ for emacs-bidi@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:59889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJpF-0001Us-DB; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9500B000J2HN00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:33:07 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.203.3]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9500BNT0Z6M700@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:33:07 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-bidi@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of Emacs support for multi-directional text." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-bidi-bounces+gnu-emacs-bidi=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-bidi-bounces+gnu-emacs-bidi=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bidi:831 gmane.emacs.devel:130599 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-bidi@gnu.org, mhibti@free.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:54:26 +0900 > > In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > > > In article <83eicy5epd.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > It's probably some bad interaction between compositions and the > > > handling of faces in the bidirectional display. > > > I found that the problem is that the current composition for > > Arabic requires that a whole word must be composed. So, if > > there's a face change within a word, Arabic composition > > function is given just a partial word, and that results in > > the incorrect Arabic shaping. This is a difficult problem, > > and I need a time to find a solution. > > I've just installed a fix to trunk. Thanks.