From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: attribute warn_unused_result Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:50:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83r5bmamqo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4D4B02EF.1080708@cs.ucla.edu> <7C616374-F2D6-4797-A66C-9C4D293B93B6@mit.edu> <4D4B20C5.1070100@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296895880 25774 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2011 08:51:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, yandros@MIT.EDU, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 05 09:51:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PldrP-0001Pa-EA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:51:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43705 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PldrO-0006tP-Vx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:51:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45221 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PldrK-0006t6-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:51:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PldrI-0003nB-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:42135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PldrI-0003mo-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG400M00Z7L3X00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:50:35 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.97.124]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG400LUOZ8614S0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:50:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135599 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Chad Brown , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs-Devel devel > Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:05:18 -0500 > > > I don't like ignore-value either. > > Shouldn't a cast to void be sufficient to tell gcc to not report > a particular case? No, it isn't. The warning remains.