From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Magit slow on Windows Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:24:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83r4urx8od.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6C45C785-8275-46B8-9D1E-FF8D2B52C3E2@bbheim.de> <83mx5gyqht.fsf@gnu.org> <84k40jz3eg.fsf@163.org> <83zk9fxoma.fsf@gnu.org> <84pqabtgky.fsf@gmail.com> <83y5ozxnzd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336735465 8788 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2012 11:24:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:24:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 11 13:24:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnxM-0002BY-7v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:24:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52362 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnxL-0007KY-Jd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36923) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnx9-0007KQ-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnx7-0004R8-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:33321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSnx7-0004Qp-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3U00G00VL1NW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:23:55 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3U00FPHVNUUGE0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:23:55 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150442 Archived-At: > From: Richard Riley > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:37:17 +0200 > > > The Windows filesystem is slower than Linux filesystems, > > especially with a cold cache, and nothing, not even Emacs, can > > change that. > > Not in anyway that would cause any human recognisable delay. Suggesting > that speed of the file system is in any way contributing to this issue > is somewhat silly and misleading and introducing fud. That the Windows filesystem is slower is a fact, not FUD in any way.