From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inline build_string performance Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:41:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83r4t1956y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4FE9CCFF.2060309@cs.ucla.edu> <4FE9E374.8010007@yandex.ru> <4FE9E691.9090906@cs.ucla.edu> <4FE9F26E.6010700@yandex.ru> <4FE9F35E.1060309@cs.ucla.edu> <4FE9F84A.9010700@yandex.ru> <4FEA038A.908@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340743283 28433 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2012 20:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 26 22:41:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SjcZd-0003X5-N5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:41:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37483 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjcZd-0002Gt-O8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjcZa-0002Gd-1d for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:41:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjcZX-0000Wo-P6 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:41:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:39642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjcZX-0000W4-HV for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M6800600RWQGI00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:41:13 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M680065LS4PGS10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:41:13 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4FEA038A.908@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151198 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:46:34 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: Emacs Development > > How about the following instead? Another change that sacrifices maintainability (and the sanity of the maintainers) for 0.0003% of speedup.