From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: todo-mode doc bug (was: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 e5c17f4: Fix todo-mode category movement) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:03:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3du2eg2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160326221513.15789.84807@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87d1qgu7az.fsf@gmx.net> <87inz6ui4g.fsf@gmx.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461578633 7875 80.91.229.3 (25 Apr 2016 10:03:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 12:03:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1audMt-0000X2-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58879 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1audMt-0005ni-1G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:03:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1audMb-0005cP-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1audMY-0005E1-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1audMY-0005Dx-AC; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4943 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1audMX-0006JW-IM; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:03:30 -0400 In-reply-to: <87inz6ui4g.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:56:15 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203287 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:56:15 +0200 > > I'm not sure what counts as trivial, and now have reason to ask for > clarification. Specifically, I noticed that the doc string of > `todo-show' is in part obsolete and incorrect -- in fact, it already was > when I initially committed this version of todo-mode to the Emacs > repository, because I had failed to update the doc string after making > the change in ea3ae33b5b94bf095c52f279887009e8fb71a9df prior to the > initial commit. (In contrast, the Todo mode Info manual contains the > correct information.) Is it ok for me to commit the following doc > string change to emacs-25, and also dispense with a bug report? Doc string corrections are always okay (assuming you are sure they are correct). I have no opinion about closing the bug. Thanks.