From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'. Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:53:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83r37xq5xs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874m5lr92d.fsf@red-bean.com> <83eg4p9hqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87inu1ghud.fsf@red-bean.com> <83y42x7yud.fsf@gnu.org> <87poo8g2zi.fsf@red-bean.com> <7abf7a00-3f17-4ef6-bfbd-0f5df4e7acd6@default> <87twcutfqe.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475477641 32099 195.159.176.226 (3 Oct 2016 06:54:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 06:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 08:53:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqx83-0005T2-Ny for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:53:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqx82-000161-Eh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 02:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqx7w-00015k-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 02:53:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqx7t-0003Sb-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 02:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqx7t-0003SS-9c; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 02:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4945 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bqx7q-0006fg-UW; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 02:53:23 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:30 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207948 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:30 -0400 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams , > Emacs developers > > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Karl Fogel wrote: > > > > I can't (re)close the bug, because it was closed earlier as "wontfix" and it now says "Bug is archived. No further changes may be made." > > It looks like the "wontfix" tag wasn't actually applied. You can send > a message to with contents > > unarchive 286 > tag 286 fixed > quit > > To mark it as "fixed". See https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html > for more options/details. I frequently wish for debbugs to be more helpful and not require such subtle techniques. It looks like it always takes the dumbest possible interpretation of my commands, when there's a slight problem with it.