From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add new bytecode op `switch' for implementing branch tables. Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:14:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83r33a566t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a89z6ro6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486484146 423 195.159.176.226 (7 Feb 2017 16:15:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Vibhav Pant Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 17:15:34 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8QX-00083i-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:15:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55131 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Qd-0008Sn-42 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:15:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Pc-0008Qp-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:14:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Pa-0008FC-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:14:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Pa-0008F4-6N; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:14:34 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1790 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8PZ-0004bm-Hf; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:14:33 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Vibhav Pant on Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:56:23 +0530) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212101 Archived-At: > From: Vibhav Pant > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:56:23 +0530 > Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Is it possible to add some tests that would ensure that code which > > will use this bytecode will still yield the same results as with > > previous byte compiler and interpreter? > > I've added a few tests to test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el Thank you!