From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lisp primitives and their calling of the change hooks Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 22:05:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83r2qy6bmp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mv1p8vki.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmi58sao.fsf@gnu.org> <20180107194845.GE22254@ACM> <838td98mqe.fsf@gnu.org> <20180107211055.GF22254@ACM> <837est81bl.fsf@gnu.org> <20180108192415.GA5531@ACM> <83h8rw6oio.fsf@gnu.org> <20180109195357.GA3869@ACM> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515528269 28758 195.159.176.226 (9 Jan 2018 20:04:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 21:04:24 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ089-0006iF-P4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 21:04:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ0A9-0007fo-AE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:06:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ0A0-0007e6-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ09x-0000ug-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ09x-0000ua-Kg; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1583 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eZ09v-0004WK-Rk; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:06:09 -0500 In-reply-to: <20180109195357.GA3869@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:53:57 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221767 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:53:57 +0000 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > However, I think we'll agree that we've already spent enough time > debating this issue. If you still say one b/a-c-f pair for a > (successful) zlib-decompress-region call, I will accept it, and fix the > b/a-c-f call of the unsuccessful case. Yes, I still think that zlib-decompress-region is a replacement primitive (and base64-decode-region is in error not behaving the same). Thanks.