From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preview: portable dumper Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:08:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83r2pkdijd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3cdb4c89-0498-41d6-ba43-93f012cc9bb1@email.android.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518797187 29342 195.159.176.226 (16 Feb 2018 16:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alan@idiocy.org, angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 16 17:06:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emiWc-0006lb-GH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:06:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emiYe-0000QV-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emiYU-0000Pl-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emiYR-0008Gd-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:08:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emiYR-0008GX-0k; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2495 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1emiYQ-0002BJ-Ar; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:08:06 -0500 In-reply-to: <3cdb4c89-0498-41d6-ba43-93f012cc9bb1@email.android.com> (message from Daniel Colascione on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:44:50 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222823 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:44:50 -0800 > From: Daniel Colascione > Cc: alan@idiocy.org, angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > That the dump-array proposal caps > the size of the dump (which will probably break user redumping) and that strip(1) breaks the concatenation > approach suggests that maybe the existing separate file option is right after all. I do indeed think that we should make the separate file method stable and collect some experience with it, before consider more advanced and/or clever approaches.