From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-dir operation is very slow on large git repositories in Emacs 26.1 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:44:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83r2kxtk9w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k1qtsbgi.fsf@gnu.org> <30712254-6225-c6a8-1457-698c64e37739@yandex.ru> <83zhzltyii.fsf@gnu.org> <5218794b-b9ef-3c0d-d3c1-bf40c42e64b2@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529779391 17106 195.159.176.226 (23 Jun 2018 18:43:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 18:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alexharsanyi@gmail.com, tom@tromey.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 23 20:43:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fWnV5-0004Mf-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 20:43:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39418 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWnXC-0005nn-24 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWnWY-0005nX-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:44:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWnWT-0002Sc-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWnWT-0002SX-PU; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:44:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2842 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fWnWS-0001Lj-UG; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:44:33 -0400 In-reply-to: <5218794b-b9ef-3c0d-d3c1-bf40c42e64b2@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:28:14 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226631 Archived-At: > Cc: alexharsanyi@gmail.com, tom@tromey.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:28:14 +0300 > > On 6/23/18 4:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Since we added a command that produces a lot of output, some slowdown > > is to be expected, no? > > Right. So my concern here is whether we really need to use such a > command. Or, rather, how much work is it going to be to avoid using it. I assume it was added to fix some problem or issue. What was that issue, and what are the alternatives that avoid issuing the command?