From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 20:01:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83r2izimxc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <83zhxummef.fsf@gnu.org> <83lg9em1v6.fsf@gnu.org> <86r2j5q67t.fsf@gmail.com> <83r2j4lvyo.fsf@gnu.org> <86va8gj12l.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1owlscr.fsf@gnu.org> <86mutsiy80.fsf@gmail.com> <83eff4lqon.fsf@gnu.org> <86eff4ixcj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7pslnzz.fsf@gnu.org> <86eff4turj.fsf@gmail.com> <83y3dbju00.fsf@gnu.org> <86ftzjs73w.fsf@gmail.com> <83pnymjomm.fsf@gnu.org> <86va8d3ln1.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7ppj8vd.fsf@gnu.org> <83600dj7qz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534352453 3153 195.159.176.226 (15 Aug 2018 17:00:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 17:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 15 19:00:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fpzA8-0000hF-VT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:00:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpzCF-00089W-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpzC5-000899-2R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpzBT-0001f1-0F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpzB4-0001Qp-LW; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2823 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fpzAy-0005HA-Lg; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:01:41 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Andy Moreton on Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:16:46 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228564 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:16:46 +0100 > > Another approach is to force static linking. Since my suggestion to the same effect up-thread was voted down, I think using static linking on a single platform would be a mistake, from the maintenance POV. How about reopening that closed ticket on the MSYS2 issue tracker, and asking them to make the distribution consistent with how they want users to link against GMP?