From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: latin-prefix input method niggles Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:05:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83r2djhdws.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y37sgvej.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547190239 9929 195.159.176.226 (11 Jan 2019 07:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 11 08:03:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghqrC-0002Tz-FE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:03:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33161 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghqtI-0003L2-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:06:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghqtC-0003Kl-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:05:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghqtC-0001A0-Dq; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:05:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2981 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ghqtB-0001xo-IW; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:05:58 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:36:01 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232306 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:36:01 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think we should make latin-prefix be consistent with latin-postfix. > > Each one of the above is correct in the latter, AFAICT, so we should > > just fix the problems in latin-prefix. E.g., ~a should produce both ã > > and ă, ~c should produce č, and ġ should be produced by .g. I see no > > reason to have these two behave inconsistently; do you? > > .g already produces ġ, changing ~c to produce č is easy. I take it > youʼre ok with adding ,c -> ç Yes, because it'd be consistent with latin-postfix. > *time passes* I hadn't realised you could define multiple productions > for the same mapping. So we instead end up with > > ~c -> ç > ~c -> č > ~a -> ã > ~a -> ă > > in that order, since that keeps the current latin-prefix mappings of > ~c and ~a first. We could also add ,c -> ç for consistency with > latin-postfix. Right.