From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Oddities with dynamic modules Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:20:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83r2azs4kf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y3b4wdw9.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvhal45r.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8bwt1on.fsf@gnu.org> <83bm24t0hv.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="3096"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 09:25:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FUk-0000gF-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:25:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FUj-00058M-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FUW-0004xg-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FPy-0003Wb-4v; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:20:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2563 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FPx-00020C-L0; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:20:45 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:58:11 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234527 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:58:11 +0100 > Cc: Emacs developers > > > No, it's not only of historical interest, because we can add > > functions. > > That's true, and I agree for those we should find some clearer critera > than "best judgment" or philosophical vague principles like > "simplicity." > [...] > For example, I'd vote for adding timespec and bignum conversion > functions based on (2). I agree with the last proposal. But I also think that we need a lot more convenience wrappers even for existing functionalities. Any non-trivial module whose code I ever saw is a clear evidence to that, as they all introduce their own wrappers for practically the same purposes.