From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore pending_signals when checking for quits. Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 21:42:01 +0300 Message-ID: <83r29mt1ja.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y36nl7rl.fsf@gnu.org> <20190211201739.25229-1-phst@google.com> <834l97pv0l.fsf@gnu.org> <83y345bvk6.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="175791"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: phst@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 28 20:44:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hKomj-000jaN-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:44:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKomi-00031k-0F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 14:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKoli-0002zc-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 14:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39117) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKokv-00082i-Cm; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 14:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1354 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hKokr-0005Dq-8N; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 14:42:29 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:19:42 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236012 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:19:42 +0200 > Cc: Emacs developers , Philipp Stephani > > > > Question: Would it be OK to backport the first part (using QUITP in > > > module_should_quit) to Emacs 26.3? > > > > Please show the part that you suggest to backport, I don't think I > > understand what that is. > > The initial patch, i.e. > > --- a/src/emacs-module.c > +++ b/src/emacs-module.c > @@ -671,13 +671,13 @@ module_vec_size (emacs_env *env, emacs_value vec) > return ASIZE (lvec); > } > > -/* This function should return true if and only if maybe_quit would do > - anything. */ > +/* This function should return true if and only if maybe_quit would > + quit. */ > static bool > module_should_quit (emacs_env *env) > { > MODULE_FUNCTION_BEGIN_NO_CATCH (false); > - return (! NILP (Vquit_flag) && NILP (Vinhibit_quit)) || pending_signals; > + return QUITP; > } If you don't mind breaking compatibility in a minor release, I'm okay with backporting this.