From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 21:44:32 +0300
Message-ID: <83r28izaen.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3r28xrfl9.fsf@gnus.org> <m3v9y99000.fsf@gnus.org>
	<831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> <m3ef4x8v8m.fsf@gnus.org>
	<83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> <m3y33575w3.fsf@gnus.org>
	<CAM-tV--a0L=t42b_wXu7XaZx6ALb0JbwPodrhpJebswS6ZawKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3tvdtfh66.fsf@gnus.org> <m3d0khfejq.fsf@gnus.org>
	<m35zq9fe64.fsf@gnus.org> <m3tvdtdx5g.fsf@gnus.org>
	<m3o941dwq7.fsf@gnus.org> <m3a7fldvjn.fsf@gnus.org>
	<m34l5tdu4i.fsf@gnus.org>
	<CAM-tV-8cm76XUD8SuKF2jMNb_gwc0q_jxWs8nuth==_a1jo44w@mail.gmail.com>
	<m35zpurjs3.fsf@gnus.org>
	<CAM-tV-_=RrOFobrdnzdYBWVZ8v2DSQJzpi2Mbsa2E3gL3kDBNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3ef4iq0pd.fsf@gnus.org>
	<CAM-tV--Rvb0RFRfpP4u348U0-EAcN-NLVfEzTRkE9Rc7RAacWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<m38suqq03h.fsf@gnus.org> <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<m3lfyqobq7.fsf@gnus.org>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="246879"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 28 20:45:14 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hVh62-00126P-7J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 20:45:14 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40995 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hVh60-0007IV-UX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 14:45:12 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56079)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1hVh5N-0007EC-1M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 14:44:33 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37124)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1hVh5J-00006U-Jr; Tue, 28 May 2019 14:44:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4498 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1hVh5F-0003Lm-GS; Tue, 28 May 2019 14:44:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <m3lfyqobq7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 
	28 May 2019 17:11:28 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237120
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/237120>

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: npostavs@gmail.com,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:11:28 +0200
> 
> >> And Eli hasn't OK'd the with-suppressed-warnings yet.  :-)  Did that
> >> patch look OK?
> >
> > Not sure what this alludes to.  I may have missed some question?
> 
> It's this patch.  It adds the syntax
> 
>   (with-suppressed-warnings (obsolete some-function)
>     (some-function la la la))
> 
> which is very similar to with-no-warnings, only it specifies precisely
> which warning on what function we're suppressing.

If this is for master, I'm not sure you need my explicit approval.
Or did someone object vociferously?

But if you do push this, please call this macro out in NEWS, and
perhaps also document it in the ELisp manual.

Thanks.