From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 17:54:50 +0300
Message-ID: <83r1t7h7wl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <875zalolt7.fsf@bernoul.li>
 <jwvv9iljyk8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87v9ikmmly.fsf@bernoul.li>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="1656"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 19 16:55:36 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jxAj2-0000LM-87
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:55:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jxAj1-00041L-8d
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:55:35 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42438)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jxAiQ-0003Vc-De
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:54:58 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45612)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jxAiP-0006na-JU; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:54:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1699 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jxAiP-0002r4-0K; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:54:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87v9ikmmly.fsf@bernoul.li> (message from Jonas Bernoulli on Sun, 
 19 Jul 2020 01:26:01 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253103
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/253103>

> From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:26:01 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Let's look at it from another perspective: what are the *benefits* of
> making the "major code parts" children of "Code:"?  The only one that
> I can think of is that the name of that section "Code" implies that it
> contains all the code.  I would argue that is a just a tiny benefit as
> well.

But if we agree to your proposal, what would be the purpose of the
"Code:" section?  It no longer contains all of the code, but what does
it contain?