From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:41:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1bcuxld.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <8735nszpdv.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvswrp8.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgq0tu7z.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnl4v8dh.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32459"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 13:50:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mo3La-0008CA-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 13:50:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo3LY-0000yh-GT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo3Ci-00035Q-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=50480 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo3Ci-0003qw-FK; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:41:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=tkR1gNu2sDr0/LpiaSUPhrcX4kv9P8K+bnMKcRydLPs=; b=giAiZsUHVi3H fgMP5nnrBmXEtYWVg6Hr2i+GGDzr5gMGK/WV6SNnlf1jQugL8/R5epQlhsdfkznOMR4UAciYyebKK x2kda0lXoxyShUayF3efqzrnV+rSbGPEInYYe5+Dvb9uuruEQDIRg0PGAA+DtGsVw/5Cdc3d/rqXJ GHBvyPqc8sQJoEqZcCuefUk8lWx0MnGZP3Rnzm2DE3be4Qh+X0T8FKoeobiOqps3gMuu64DTjkrmQ HFG6YulG5xQSdvLwaLwAcDMzFOqU4OQqmoY+P/FmXCvNWdgjuixwlldumEVfA2yLc4uxyaeKLTU0W /2tlLUHZ8PKcP06kqJyMlQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1702 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo3Ci-00049J-3F; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:41:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:28:52 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279747 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:28:52 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Here the font of variable-pitch face is actually larger by a pixel or > > two, but this is MS-Windows. > > I suspect that the fonts used are from two different font families, and > thus have different x-heights. Of course they are from different families, otherwise how can one be fixed-pitch and the other variable-pitch. It is rare for the same family to provide both. > Could you check which fonts are being used for both variable-pitch > and fixed-pitch, and which font sizes are reported by Emacs when one > looks larger than the other? Both have the height of 13, according to "C-u C-x =". And in a debugger I see that both faces have the height attribute of 98 (in units of 1/10 point). So it sounds like Emacs thinks these have the same height, and still the line height changes by about 1 pixel depending on whether I do or don't use the variable-pitch face on that line. Maybe I'm missing something.