From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 14:36:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83r197yhzv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mtjwzwkb.fsf@gnu.org> <87r198ytog.fsf@gnus.org> <87lezfzy5h.fsf@gnus.org> <83sftnyilw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7a3zx0z.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25875"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 16 13:39:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n94p1-0006WA-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:39:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n94oz-0002P8-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 07:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n94mQ-0001ge-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 07:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47212 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n94mP-0001tD-EF; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 07:37:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=4FFh2XGWcsW5A7ZwQ+9qo78iDTCuUbM422f509L9KlM=; b=UP0UBpHFQ83D zG6ouH7erDeEExyUsKXrTDMALGeYomIthl6olTOTJu5ynkh/35OzzsHWisPtq8/c5GrhrJNN/x0SY CvP2mvCRCkC/uq1C0Hm8gAwArfTh5jEaf7vUsQAzvpzva6m6VGiSMez/aCBtSyUiPKn5WuaCZGpUr 9aAyET0xaqt+Vs1/BhgZs5NlRsry7HjS27Q/3wZ0vd6fGm43RQWvHUo1UA+NaixKOosWzMVmVVEMO bM3Uxe063TWjkw6zv6mo+Zi5LGNG+b167k9Kui+ju5VsfFM1Bv4dN+JlyMyg+bzGAyHneT1Avaqji 4NYq57UkJmNxAy/XQpifRQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4998 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n94mP-0000FM-HG; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 07:37:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h7a3zx0z.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:26:52 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284811 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:26:52 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Since this is glaringly inconsistent with the timings Alan published, > > Did Alan benchmark byte compilation? No. But scrolling through a C file invokes a lot of Lisp, so such different results are surprising. > > I think it would be a good idea to measure the difference for each of > > the*.el files, because it could be that a couple of outliers skew the > > entire picture. That is, put the 'time' command inside the 'do', and > > don't use -j8; then compare the outputs. > > I'm not sure what that's supposed to show? Whether the slowdown is uniform or not. If it is not uniform, then it is no longer certain that the time to recompile all the *.el files in the Emacs source tree is a good representative of the effect of this change on our users.