From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Major modes using `widen' is a good, even essential, programming practice. Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 20:34:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83r11qvdu7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6ae35c9306ade07b4c45@heytings.org> <83fsi7wjqe.fsf@gnu.org> <838rnzvup5.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8r2vrfs.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5238"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 08 19:36:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oL6fn-00016z-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 19:36:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39830 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oL6fl-0000Mu-NU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:36:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oL6eV-0007v9-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:34:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oL6eT-0006lJ-N7; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:34:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=oJ6qY8hbp1S426xdn3FYcOm00NEK24LHX4giJ0/oheI=; b=qNuW8qlYEl7l pgmCatYEXCi1tNcMNlZXZToydODHcsbT1rH6iFJuovhqiq5bsPTfG34tCaivm0AL6kVPzvSrv1tKE Eur7eMZsUbfbOUqxmueWPAY9pPzsUs2p/1R1xZ5ODtQxkzrocStrbHOAarqUMunAGTsDp97JJtWhq Te9N9TLn0UH+kid95WOPEsiiVviidfJ7yYjWnaIKWXb1eGewSn+trB3dX3xYacbFPNoU7IUQzbAtL ZQOLsw0zU2zu7uIBoZwgMOS+39TjQFay0Tzm5cOhL3agcHTCvrGW94L7Uqj2Cl50U+rzjN0kKkGFj 2sDNffhXr+RZp6naC7EGtw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4837 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oL6eT-0004yT-5y; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:34:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:22:03 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293277 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: acm@muc.de, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:22:03 -0400 > > >> On my own builds (which are slow on old machines), 18MB typically > >> results in a delay of just a few seconds. > > Optimized build or unoptimized? > > Unoptimized. > > > And is that before or after the syntax-wholeline-max limitation? > > Before. I'm basically talking about the time to do `parse-partial-sexp` > from BOB to EOB. Then your old machine is much faster than my new one.