From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs-repository-{version|branch} on Windows
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 22:56:08 +0200
Message-ID: <83r0yi4exj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAAeL0SRxiByrjFrwKi+-EzTvAAbd0Ugvp-xmXkyLy1=s-ak1XA@mail.gmail.com>
 <83v8nu4kp6.fsf@gnu.org> <jwviljuv7wj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAAeL0SQxzOqCT0xyzR04N1GYvrb+1v_TjnisODnG+SeCGj3vWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <83tu3e4g5n.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAAeL0SR7c3HfuJ_b+=dXvsoAwRUNXH8aGpnzPCL8yxL=3oA5=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <jwvk04atpky.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="4955"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 04 22:12:15 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1or3z4-00012P-BM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 22:12:14 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1or3yH-0005dR-U0; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 17:11:25 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1or3ja-0005Ni-3q
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:56:17 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1or3jZ-0005jJ-S4; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:56:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=AqDMHwibTtT/cRideKxX/ABM0O5c3zXlYyJYnAnnonA=; b=jwySy8dQ6dx4
 cECjkMJIDFtQIVKKb0vb7DtL4UZalltyBSzoEWYabK/L1L49BEhw3S+V5YJxA+yb/Vo74o0TKMfp9
 QMGMbL66Lz3iY9Fy38meh9JxxF2crW7O6Q5vgXlgMFtUsZ5656gDJMzm3l9/AOx3wRgwOhnMyth53
 MxElQNU1fSYmCCdrChvR22JhIzP54so3tzovbfjvOCKLYLhd2NyFLsR6xIGTXsUsNOMsU5jOzH0b8
 OuRuYcdz6SE5F44Olig7G/cZYYwKyXPVx4uGrToLn/QIlkGZQP4euQ5lB30vPIsgkXteXGCZ8kK8c
 7lER3tIkTYSXU6Zy8iK+XQ==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1or3jY-0000lg-Oy; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:56:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <jwvk04atpky.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:47:18 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299158
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/299158>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:47:18 -0400
> 
> > Anyway, yeah, I agree, it's something the user has to take care of...
> > As long as they know, or remember. And the git error being silenced
> > didn't help ;-)
> 
> Maybe the better way forward is to tweak the code so it doesn't silence
> this kind of error.

Then you'd hit a much worse extremity: that the user is annoyed by
problems most of them don't understand and don't want to know about.