From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Allow applying filters to summary consecutively Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:06:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83r0ybs07r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jvaont2.fsf@autistici.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14109"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: andrea.monaco@autistici.org, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 09:08:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ot2cA-0003TF-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:08:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot2bK-0000cK-Vg; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 03:07:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot2aD-0000VZ-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 03:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot2aB-0006aW-MF; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 03:06:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/nZmUNXsbxQKq3Z0/lVtcxEQxomFi+piQNUSsDiTuTg=; b=g/Gkb8vFND0R VCKHxR5ZTRyFq+ov0LBqo6NUTA/vO3ZJsWyuB4BoznDrJjk/UuEpZdAlj/jwJE45DRGuDOHrIPYjH olZos6YnexXNGyCRySR/jHlIgDQRaqXhzGs1F8/NQ1KpfoJ2sS2XdrdagsTtihEbtwrqfSxHL4jmp dJewY9mEgJVLuFBABDFpyPL8NX2GNQyjPwTS+b77OpEXI7s0gGhDQ5S9WrG0qkeTjTPlPB4/XmMSr 6I0+K3FEqmz4MECvx4beO4i4rS+t6IkxWiOSENzoJ59LockUTeEKBL5av44ER0oGWhEZaXeWE3h5W 2OeUIXZuuadLDReFZAt5Tw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot2ZU-0001mo-T7; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 03:06:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 09 Nov 2022 23:04:02 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299461 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 23:04:02 -0500 > > Does it mean "using one summary filtering cpmmand when a filtered > summary already exists"? That is the meaning I would expect in this > case. But if so, "consecutive commands" is not the way to say it. Your guess is correct. I was struggling with finding a good description for this. What would you suggest as a good wording?