From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unwanted undo-boundary Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83pr47xi9r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tytkxxkx.fsf@gnu.org> <83sk93y9t2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266206403 10374 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2010 04:00:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 15 05:00:00 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngs7r-0004J7-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:00:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ngs7r-0005OA-GP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ngs7l-0005O4-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:59:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58556 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ngs7k-0005Nw-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngs7k-0008Ji-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:35740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngs7j-0008Jc-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:59:51 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KXV0090072RS100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:59:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.67.249]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KXV009I373QOI30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:59:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121127 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:32:25 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Looks like I need some more hand-helding. I put a breakpoint here > > (gdb) b Fundo_boundary > > and executed in Emacs > > M-: (indent-region 1 (point-max)) > > and then called xbacktrace at each stop at Fundo_boundary. There were > five lines in the region and on each of them Fundo_boundary was called > but I do not understand how. I thought xbacktrace should give me > information about it, but it does not seem to do that as far as I can > see. So I guess I have to call bt instead, or? As you discovered, you need both bt and xbacktrace. (Actually, bt should invoke xbacktrace automatically for you.)