From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: attribute warn_unused_result Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:16:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83pqr8byzt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4D4B02EF.1080708@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296772832 20223 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2011 22:40:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 23:40:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl7qd-0005aA-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:40:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56339 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl7ox-0002Yh-Eo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:38:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50962 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl6ZM-000509-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl6XJ-0007bu-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl6XJ-0007bo-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG2007007VVHI00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:16:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.97.124]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG2006D88ENTJ90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:16:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4D4B02EF.1080708@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135533 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:33:03 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 02/03/11 10:53, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > So, for each such case, we should think about it and if we indeed want > > to ignore the return value, we should put an explicit cast to that > > effect (which should hopefully be understood by gcc to silence the > > warning). > > Gnulib's ignore-value module is designed for that. And is butt-ugly, IMO.