From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Colascione <dan.colascione@gmail.com>
Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org,
monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r104691: Don't reuse previous Message-id when resending.
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:56:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83pqlyslyd.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E093222.3060302@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:45:06 -0700
> From: Daniel Colascione <dan.colascione@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> You should reconsider that decision. Stephen's message cogently
> explains _exactly_ why the behavior specified in the RFC is also the
> right thing to do. He's provided plenty of evidence that Message-Id
> reuse adversely affects MUA threading. The burden of demonstrating
> otherwise is now yours to show otherwise.
Who's talking about _reuse_? The use case is that the original
message didn't get sent. There's no reuse; there's a single message
with an ID that never saw the light of day before.
Now, can we _please_ stop this silly thread??
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1QZnWt-0001JW-56@colonialone.fsf.org>
2011-06-25 13:32 ` [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r104691: Don't reuse previous Message-id when resending Stefan Monnier
2011-06-25 20:14 ` Glenn Morris
2011-06-26 16:17 ` Richard Stallman
2011-06-27 7:17 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-06-27 16:28 ` Richard Stallman
2011-06-27 17:47 ` Uday S Reddy
2011-06-28 16:14 ` Richard Stallman
2011-06-27 20:28 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-06-27 23:03 ` Richard Stallman
2011-06-28 1:31 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-06-28 1:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2011-06-28 2:56 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-06-28 13:28 ` Uday S Reddy
2011-06-28 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-06-29 21:40 ` David Kastrup
2011-06-28 16:13 ` Richard Stallman
2011-06-28 17:51 ` Richard Riley
2011-06-29 10:57 ` Richard Stallman
2011-06-30 16:46 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83pqlyslyd.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=dan.colascione@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).